Archive for June, 2008

Pope John Paul I and Pope John XXIII

I haven’t forgotten my promise to write some more about Pope John Paul I. I wanted first of all to finish this month of June, on the feast of Sts. Peter and Paul, with his memorial to Pope John XXIII, who died 45 years ago this month. Of all the Popes in modern times (at least since Pius VIII died in 1830), the Pope with the shortest reign next to John Paul I was John XXIII. And though his reign was one of the shortest, it was also perhaps the most important, because of his work for peace and justice and the calling of the Second Vatican Council.

He certainly has much in common with his successor John Paul I, whose “humble service” as Pope was also brief, and also very important for the world. Papa Luciani was defined by one of his friends, Cardinal Hyancinthe Thiandoum, the Archbishop of Dakar, as a “spiritual son of Pope John XXIII” because of his capacity to see far and look to the future of the Church. Certainly he was just as beloved as Pope John for his smile and his simplicity of manner. Luciani closely followed every aspect of Angelo Roncalli’s life, as his writings show. He was consecrated a bishop by Pope John on December 27, 1958, and entered his new diocese of Vittorio Veneto on January 11, 1959, just two weeks before Pope John called the Second Vatican Council. Luciani spent the whole of his life as a bishop affected by this Council. and deeply loved the Pope who had called it. He succeeded Roncalli as Patriarch of Venice in December 1969, and then followed him into the See of St. Peter on August 26, 1978. Like Pope John, he is on his way to sainthood.

Their spiritual kinship is very obvious from these excepts from Luciani’s writings about Pope John from 1963. The first is the letter to his diocese of Vittorio Veneto, announcing the Pope’s death. In them, writing about the Pope as “his son,” Luciani seems to be giving, without realizing it, a spiritual portrait of himself, especially when he described the late Pope as someone who “in his simplicity and without trying to . . . made an extraordinary impression on every kind of person” and as someone of “goodness, humility and a robust faith in God.”

June 3, 1963

My esteemed priests and beloved faithful, today at 7:49 p.m., Pope John XXIII died piously and serenely after 81 and a half years of life and 4 years, 7 months and 6 days of “humble service” as Pope.

This “service,” in a very brief space of time, was in reality very dense with generous works for the benefit of both the Church and the whole world. “Humble” on the other hand, was the attitude of his spirit. Placed on a high cathedra, he presented himself to the world, saying, “I am one of you, I am your brother Joseph!” While working, teaching or approaching people in small groups or vast crowds, he repeated without every becoming tired: “Let us seek what unites us!” “Let’s have faith in God and mankind!” Let’s love one another!”

Simple, abandoned to the “good providence” of God, smiling and full of sensitive kindness to everyone, but resolute and tireless, right at the dawn of his pontificate he launched the daring idea of an ecumenical Council, which he patiently prepared for and courageously initiated, and for the success of which he repeatedly offered his life.

Never, perhaps, has a Pope been so loved as has John XXIII, by the whole world, even non-Catholics, and it is surprising to observe how, in his simplicity and without trying to, he made an extraordinary impression on every kind of person. This leads us to mediate on and imitate his example of goodness, humility and robust faith in God.

In the meantime, however, we have the filial duty of supporting his pious soul with prayer, all the more so since, before becoming Pope, he was for five years our most beloved and venerated metropolitan Patriarch (1). I myself cannot forget that I was consecrated a bishop by his august hands. And therefore with the soul of his son and your brother, at his moment I invite you all to pay him your respects and offer prayers for his soul. (Albino Luciani / John Paul I, Opera Omnia, vol. 3, p. 43.)

The second is the homily Luciani gave in the cathedral in Vittorio Veneto, three days later, on June 6. It contains a very moving reminiscence of the talk that he had with Pope John shortly before his consecration as a bishop.

The idea of Pope John that has made the greatest impression on my soul is this: Ecclesia Christi, lumen gentium! [The Church of Christ is the light of nations]. (2) The Church must shine not only on Catholics, but on everyone; it belongs to everyone, we must try to help everyone get to know it better.

When the Apostolic Delegate Angelo Roncalli arrived in Turkey at the beginning of 1935, he felt a pang in his heart: there were dozens of priests and thousands of faithful there, but almost none of them had bothered to learn the national language of Turkey; the Catholics were somewhat closed within themselves, they formed an island. He tried to remedy the situation as best he could: he ordered that the official acts of the Delegation be written in Turkish, before each of his sermons he had the Gospel passage read in Turkish and ordered that the “Blessed be God” be recited in Turkish at the end of Mass. There was amazement and criticism and some people asked: “What are these novelties for?” He answered, “They are for both the Catholics and the Turks. To the Catholics I would like to say: ‘Come on, come out of your isolation! Give up the French and the other things that hinder you, and get to know these people who are your hosts and who are also made for the truth!` To the Turks, I want to say, ‘Dear Turks! We cannot give away a single point of our creed, but we want to let you know that the creed itself obliges us to show you our liking for you, our sincere esteem for the good you have been able to create, and our desire to walk together with you when it comes to things that are good by their nature.’”

It was, on a small scale, the program that he applied on a large scale as Pope: to build bridges towards the world.

The Council is one of these bridges. In an audience for us bishops of the Veneto, he told how the idea had come to him. “One morning Tardini (3) came here with his usual stack of papers. We reviewed them, then we examined the world situation. So many problems, so many difficulties! We said, ‘What can the Church do to help?’ I had not thought about it before, but at that moment a word flashed into my mind, and I said, ‘It would take an Ecumenical Council!’ When the word was said, I almost surprised at having pronounced it and I looked at Tardini. Right away, he placed the papers on the table; I saw his eyes shine behind his glasses, and I heard him say, ‘Holiness, that is a great idea! Yes, it would take a Council!’ I am accustomed to following with simplicity what seem to me to be inspirations from the Lord. I did so then, and you know the rest.”

And you, my faithful, know it too. You have heard John XXIII speak on every occasion about the Council. He saw it as an examination, a self-criticism by the Church in order to improve itself, to beautify and renew itself and in this way to present itself as more attractive, convincing and welcoming to the separated brothers and to the rest of the world. No sermons would even be necessary, he said once, quoting St. John Chrysostom, if our faith really shone in our lives!

And in his famous speech at the opening of the Council, he was also thinking of the world. “Don’t forget!” he seemed to be saying in his precise Latin, “I don’t want a Council-museum, that limits itself to gathering and cataloging antiques; the Council must be instead a forge that brings forth doctrines that are unchanged, but in new forms, with a new spirit, in view of new needs. Today the Church must be a mother to everyone, kind, patient, and full of mercy, even towards the separated brothers; the great medicine of today must be mercy.”

Mater et Magistra can also be considered a bridge towards the world. The problems treated in it are of interest to everyone: it speaks, among other things, of the imbalances between advanced and under-developed nations, it deals with de- colonialization, with world population, which is growing in the face of meager means of sustenance. And it concludes: we are responsible for the under-developed countries, we must help, both as private individuals, and as nations!

In the encyclical, the principles remain firm: the well-known unfortunate ideologies are called “incomplete and erroneous,” it speaks of Christians who “have been savagely persecuted for a number of years” in many countries, and of the “refined cruelty of their persecutors;” Catholics are warned “not to compromise” when “the integrity of religion or morals would suffer harm.” Once this had been said, however, “a spirit of understanding” is recommended, Catholics are invited to “join sincerely in doing whatever is naturally good or conducive to good,” and for the first time, in an encyclical, there is explicit praise for secular Institutions like the International Labor Organization and the FAO. (4)

Pacem in Terris, on the other hand, is the first encyclical in which a Pope addresses not only the bishops and the faithful, but “all men of good will” on whatever side of the boundaries of the Catholic Church. Even here a single iota of doctrine does not fall. The peace of which it speaks is Christian peace, founded solely on the fear of God, love for mankind, and on liberty. Considering the phenomenon of refugees, it says clearly that “there are some political regimes that do not guarantee for individual citizens a sufficient sphere of freedom . . . in fact, under those regimes even the lawful existence of such a sphere of freedom . . . is denied.” (5) But then it observes: we must not “confuse error with the person who errs; the person who errs is always and above all a human being, and he retains in any case his dignity as a human person; and he should always be regarded and treated in accordance with that lofty dignity.” (6) Absolutely nothing is conceded to error, but a step is taken towards those who are in error. Meetings between Catholics and non-Catholics on questions of a practical order are possible under certain conditions, and those are: that we be watchful in avoiding illicit compromises, that we be prudent, that there be an accordance with natural law, with the social doctrine of the Church and with the directives of ecclesiastical authority.

This is not the place to enumerate all that Pope John has done for the good, not only of the Church, but of humanity: I would only like to stress the spirit in which he has done it.

I learned about this spirit from his august lips, seated in front of his desk, in a private audience that I will never forget, five days before he consecrated me a bishop.

He confided to me that a page from the Imitation of Christ that he had meditated on in 1904 in the fervor of the very beginning of his priesthood had been providential for him and had served as an orientation for the whole course of his life. “Go and look at it for yourself,” he said to me, “It’s in Book 3, Chapter 23.” But meanwhile he recited it for me from memory. “There are four things that will bring great peace. First: seek to do the will of others rather than your own. Second: always prefer to possess less rather than much. Third: always seek the last place. Fourth: desire always, and pray that the will of God be accomplished perfectly in you.” I have always tried to put these four points into practice,” he concluded, “and I have always been content, in joys as well as in sorrows; the Lord has helped me and blessed me.”

During these sad days, thinking again about his life, and re-reading his letters and discourses, I have found that he told me the truth. He truly let himself be guided by the will of God, he did not seek success or greatness, he possessed great gentleness and patience. When he was named an archbishop in 1925, he wrote to his friends: “I feel nothing but shame and confusion, my spirit, however, is calm, and my soul is at peace. I obey, though overcoming strong repugnance at leaving certain things behind, and at venturing to do certain others, and I am putting aside all anxiety. Yes, ‘obedience and peace’: this is my episcopal motto. May it always be so.”

As apostolic visitor and then apostolic delegate in Bulgaria for nine years, he encountered trials that were neither small nor of short duration. The Catholic community there, which is in dire straits, has enormous needs and places great hopes in the delegate, but he is forced to admit his own inability to provide for everything, and to fulfill the hopes that had been cherished. Then comes the unfortunate affair of King Boris’ marriage with Giovanna of Savoy; the delegate carries on the negotiations, he assures Rome that the august groom appears sincere and willing to fulfill his obligations, but instead Boris repeats the wedding ceremony, which has already been celebrated in Assisi in the Catholic rite, in the Orthodox rite, in a way designed to cause a sensation, and later has his daughter baptized by the Orthodox.

The delegate hears that he is being criticized in the Secretariat of State, where his nomination, due solely to the Pope, is already not liked; he sees his faithful humiliated, the Orthodox exultant, the royal court irritated by the loud and clear public allusions of Pius XI; he must take difficult steps, he confesses that the affair has caused him “more troubles than there are hours in the day.” But he writes: “I hope the Lord will help me and not allow the desire for a change to issue, even once, from my lips or from my heart.” And later: “I am in the condition that St. Francis de Sales calls the state of perfection: that is, I ask for nothing, and I refuse nothing. The Lord knows that I am here. That is enough for me.” And still later: “We often suffer from impatience for great and sensational successes. We want to see and experience them every day . . . we are deceiving ourselves.” And again: “I pay no attention to what the world says of me, the testimony of my good conscience and the knowledge that the Holy Father is happy with my modest work is enough for me.”

From Bulgaria, he is transferred to Turkey and to Greece. It is anything but a great promotion, all the more so because the newspapers had spoken of him as nuncio to Romania. But he writes: “Many people on both the European and Asian shores sympathize with me and call me unfortunate. I don’t know why. I carry out the obedience that is asked of me and nothing else . . . Perhaps there are some bad days and painful situations in store for me. But I do not cease to look above and to look far.”

Here is a phrase that becomes familiar to him: “To look above and to look far.” Along with this one, he likes to repeat others. For example: “Gutta cavat lapidem [The drop of water wears away the stone]” Or: “Dabo frontem mean percutientibus [I gave my back to those who beat me]” (Is. 50:6). Or: “Omnia videre, multam dissumulare, pauca corrigere [See everything, overlook much, correct little]” (7) Imbued with this spirit of patience, detachment from the things of the world, and faith in God alone, he faces the difficulties of the nunciature in France and the diocese of Venice and also the great problems of his pontificate. After being named to Venice, he writes from Paris to the vicar of the cathedral chapter: “. . .in this nomination of mine, there is nothing of my own; therefore I will be very glad to come.” In Venice, again, facing some lively reactions to his project of removing the screens in front of the altar of the basilica of San Marco, he wrote: “If they told me that to succeed in my intention I would only have to kill one ant, I would not kill it.” It is impossible to explain his strong and gentle patience in his very long death agony without the patience that he exercised through his whole life. “There are four things that bring peace,” the Imitation of Christ had said. He constantly tried to put them into practice, and experienced for himself the truth of what the Imitation adds: Ecce, talis uomo ingreditur fines pacis et quietis — “The man who does these things enters the kingdom of tranquility and peace” (8).

Now that his mission has been completed, he has gone to the Lord. Down here there remains the good that he has done, there remains, as a stimulus and a consoler, his luminous example. There also remains his exalted teaching, and it is this: Extend the area of the Church! Truth alone is not enough, we need love too! Look above and look far! Walk on the paths of obedience to arrive at the kingdom of peace!

Let’s welcome the warning, and let’s translate his example into firm convictions and solid virtues! Let it not be said of us that the passing of Pope John has only lightly touched our hearts. Let it be said: “That great and good Pope has impressed them, convinced them, and has transformed their ideas and their lives!” (Opera Omnia 3:44-48).

NOTES

(1) Vittorio Veneto was one of the suffragan sees of Venice, where Angelo Roncalli was patriarch before becoming Pope, from 1953-1958. – Trans.

(2) Lumen Gentium (the light of nations) was also the title of the Council’s Constitution on the Church. — Trans.

(3) Domenico Cardinal Tardini was Pope John’s Secretary of State. — Trans.

(4) Mater et Magistra, nos. 212, 216, 239, 103. — Trans.

(5) Pacem in Terris, no. 104. — Trans.

(6) Pacem in Terris, no. 158. — Trans.

(7) St. Gregory the Great.

(8) Imitation of Christ, 1,3, Ch. 23, v. 7.

The St. Elizabeth trailer on YouTube

The St. Elizabeth trailer is now on YouTube — it took me long enough to figure out how to get it there! So enjoy, and if you are interested in contributing to making the documentary a reality, go here. Thanks!

The Smiling Pope — 30 Years Later

I’m amazed to realize it’s been over a month since I’ve posted anything here. I’m also amazed that I’ve posted so little so far about one of the things I hold most dear – my work on the life of Pope John Paul I, who died 30 years ago this September 28. It’s also the 30th anniversary of that whole “year of three Popes”: of the death of Paul VI, the unexpected election and even more unexpected death of John Paul I, and the election of John Paul II, the “Pope from a far country” — all incredible historical events. Beginning with Pope Benedict’s visit, I seem to have become absorbed again with all things papal, including my research on Papa Luciani, the 33-day Pope. So I’ve decided that I’ll post a series of things on the anniversary here. And first of all the story, from the beginning, of my devotion to John Paul I.

I was 22 in August 1978, just about to return to my senior year at the University of Northern Iowa. On the afternoon of Sunday, August 6, I was reading a biography of Pope Paul VI on the couch in the living room, when the TV programming was interrupted for the announcement of his death. I was very struck by the coincidence.

This was the first papal election I was able to follow as an adult (I was only seven years old when Pope John XXIII died and Pope Paul was elected). As a Catholic, maturing in my faith, it was an important time of learning and study for me. I had recently been reading the history of the papacy and the biographies of various Popes. I had read and been deeply moved by Pope John’s Journal of a Soul. I read works on the Second Vatican Council.

Now I followed the conclave, and descriptions of the history of papal elections with tremendous interest. And I thought about the late Pope, his work for the Church, and who should be his successor. None of the photos or biographies of the papabili (possible popes), such as Benelli, Pignedoli, Siri, Ursi. . . struck me at all.

As I was heading back to school on August 25, I took with me one of the Catholic papers that had published a two-page spread with the names and photos of all 111 of the cardinal electors. It was there for the first time that I saw Albino Luciani’s face and name. I don’t remember what the picture looked like – I do know he wasn’t smiling in it; it was an “official” photo. But I remember thinking with great interest: hmmm, he’s Patriarch of Venice – just like Pope John! It was only a momentary thought, but that was how I became one of the very few people in the U.S. perhaps to really linger over Luciani’s name or even know who he was, before his election. If the paper had only published the names of the papabili cardinals, his name probably wouldn’t even have been there. He was barely mentioned among the possibilities even in Rome. . .

I got to my dorm, greeted my roommate, and started unpacking. Classes would start on Tuesday. On the news, I watched as the cardinals entered the conclave.

The next day was Saturday, August 26. I wasn’t expecting anything the first day of the conclave, which was supposed to be a long one. I was in my dorm room reading one of my new textbooks early that afternoon when a voice from the radio or TV in the next room told me that Albino Cardinal Luciani had been elected Pope, and had taken the name John Paul I. It was perhaps the greatest surprise election in papal history! I turned on our TV in time for his first blessing. All I can say is that my heart turned a somersault when I saw the new Pope smile so warmly and beautifully as he opened his arms and then waved to the crowd.

I was enthralled as I learned in the next days about how the new Pope would not be crowned but would simply put on the pallium to mark the beginning of his service as bishop of Rome. I learned that he refused the sedia gestatoria and would just walk among the people. (All that seems so far away now in the era of the Popemobile – but at that time it was revolutionary. And John Paul I started it all). I read the texts of his simple talks full of love and wisdom. I looked on in amazement at the very few news clips I was able to watch, as he smiled so radiantly and transmitted such Christian joy to the world. I began collecting all the information I could about him right away, and started a file of news clippings and photos. Then, barely a month after his election, on September 29, I got up and got ready for class. On my way to our dorm cafeteria for breakfast, I stopped in the little student lounge next door to read the paper – and learned that our wonderful new Pope had died during the night. I was devastated.

In all the years since then, John Paul I has remained a spiritual father and teacher to me. I found him an inspiration not only as Pope, but as priest, bishop and cardinal. I learned Italian so I could read all his works from his years in Vittorio Veneto and Venice in the original language, and went through a great deal to get some of those works from Italy. I hoped to write a biography of him, because there wasn’t one in English. (They eventually published his collected works in nine volumes — I have those too).

Then in 1984, a bombshell. An English writer, David Yallop, claimed that John Paul I had been murdered in a book, In God’s Name, that became a best-seller – a work that I thought from the beginning to be pure fiction. But it spurred my interest in writing my biography and trying to refute his claims. At that time I was in graduate school, and started thinking about a trip to Italy to work on my thesis (which was on modern Italian history), and to do some research on the Pope at the same time. The university gave me a grant.

So in the fall of 1985, I went to Italy. I met Pope’s brother, Edoardo Luciani and his wife Anonietta, in Rome, and with them I attended the Mass celebrated by John Paul II marking the seventh anniversary of his death. I went with them to Canale D’Agordo, John Paul’s birthplace, and stayed with them in their home for a week (I even slept in the same guest room that the Pope had used on his visits home through the years). I traveled through the Veneto and interviewed those who knew Luciani in Belluno, Vittorio Veneto and Venice. I got the information I needed to refute Yallop’s claims. I put several years’ work into a full-scale biography of John Paul I. No major publisher in the U. S. would touch it (”not sensational enough”) they told me. That’s because I was going to claim he wasn’t murdered. No Catholic house I contacted would publish it either. “A major publisher should do it,” they said, “so more people will know the truth.” My work fell completely through the cracks.

In 1988, the tenth anniversary of John Paul I’s election, came new claims from another “journalist” (I use the term loosely), named John Cornwell, who actually got permission from the Vatican to investigate the Pope’s death within its walls. In the resulting book, A Thief in the Night, he too concluded that the Pope wasn’t murdered – instead he suggested that the new Pope was a simple country pastor, a nervous and timid character, who was incapable of handling the enormous responsibility, and longed to escape the intolerable burden of being Pope. He claims that John Paul was seriously ill and neglected by the Vatican staff. In short, he as good as willed himself to die. . . . An equally ridiculous conclusion for anyone who really knew anything at all about John Paul I’s life and papacy. I set out to add more material to this book to refute these new absurd claims. I got an English publisher interested. He wanted an American house to co-publish it, and started looking for one. But eventually everything fell through.

This took me to around 1994. I eventually had to acknowledge that the book wasn’t going to be published any time soon. I went back to graduate school at Fordham and eventually got my Ph.D. But with the help of the Missionary Servants of John Paul I, the Carmelites of Flemington, NJ, and other lovers of Papa Luciani, I have kept up my work, and translated many of his writings over the years for the English-language version of Humilitas; a collection of these translations was published in the book The Smiling Pope: The Life and Teaching of John Paul I, published in the U.S. in 2004 by Our Sunday Visitor Press. It was accompanied by a short biography by one of the Carmelite nuns in Flemington. This is the only accurate work in English so far. Countless other nonsensical theories about the Pope’s death are proliferating everywhere, many on the Internet.

Many petitions have been sent to Rome through the years, asking for the canonization process of John Paul I to be opened. John Paul II and now Benedict XVI (both of whom knew Albino Luciani as cardinals) have expressed deep admiration for him. On the third anniversary of Pope John Paul I’s election, John Paul II said to the people gathered for the Angelus: “Let us pray to good Pope John Paul I especially for the Church so greatly loved by him that he may obtain for us the grace of unity and sanctity.” Not quite canonization by fiat, but still pretty close. Before he was elected Pope Benedict XVI, Cardinal Ratzinger said of Papa Luciani in an interview, “I am completely convinced he is a saint.”

In 2003, not long before John Paul II’s death, Rome gave permission for the diocesan process of his predecessor to be opened in Belluno (the diocese where Luciani was born). It was concluded in November 2006, and the case in now in Rome. A miracle has been selected for evaluation. Perhaps his beatification will come soon. . . maybe even together in a joint ceremony with that of his successor, John Paul the Great. At any rate, I can now truly hope one day to venerate my dear Papa Luciani as Pope Saint John Paul I.

And with that, and the 30th anniversary of his death, I’m beginning to think my biography will have a chance. Plus, I now have a publishing company of my own to print it, if I can ever update it and finish it. I also have this blog now, to spread the word.

So you can expect me to be writing more in the next few weeks and months. I’ll talk about the Pope’s life, the truth about his death, and perhaps even post translations of a few of his writings. Se Dio vuole, “if God wills,” as Papa Luciani used to say.

And if you don’t believe me about his smile, or have forgotten, just watch this clip of his first blessing on the evening of his election (be patient, it’s at the very end).

Update on June 12

I got to thinking that the original video, which was not by me, is a little blurry — so I put together another one myself, from the news clips and pictures I’ve gathered, that I hope recreates the joyful feeling of those few days. (Check out the part beginning at 1:14 when he’s with the journalists and you’ll see what I mean!).